CMS | Romania transposes EU law on representative actions
23 Ianuarie 2024 CMS România
For more information on this law, the EU Directive it is based on, and judicial reform in Romania, contact your CMS client partner or these CMS experts: Horia Draghici and Andra Ionescu.
| |
On 23 December 2023, new legislation entered into force in Romania on the conduct of representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers, which transposes the EU Directive 2020/1828.
The newly regulated concept of representative actions will enable litigation to proceed more rapidly and cost-effectively, especially against large companies. As a result, the act could potentially change business in Romania through its approach to consumer disputes.
Representative action
“Representative action” is defined by the law as an action to protect the collective interests of consumers that is brought by a qualified entity as a plaintiff on behalf of consumers to seek injunctive relief, remedial relief, or both. In other words, the law allows qualified entities, whether private entities or independent public authorities, to act on behalf of multiple consumers.
The newly regulated concept of representative actions will enable litigation to proceed more rapidly and cost-effectively, especially against large companies. As a result, the act could potentially change business in Romania through its approach to consumer disputes.
Representative action
“Representative action” is defined by the law as an action to protect the collective interests of consumers that is brought by a qualified entity as a plaintiff on behalf of consumers to seek injunctive relief, remedial relief, or both. In other words, the law allows qualified entities, whether private entities or independent public authorities, to act on behalf of multiple consumers.
Court representation – qualified entities
For an entity to be a “qualified one”, it must fulfil some specific requirements, such as: (i) it must be a legal entity that can prove that it has carried out, during the 12 months preceding the application for designation, a public activity in relation to the protection of consumer interests; (ii) it must have a legitimate interest in protecting the interests of consumers; (iii) it must be a non-profit entity.
Possible remedies
The remedies available for the benefit of consumers are diverse, including damage, repair, replacement, price reduction or termination, varying on a case-by-case basis.
Consumer consent
In order to be represented collectively by the qualified entity for the purpose of obtaining redress, consumers must give their written consent within 30 days of the beginning of the action. This implies that consumers concerned will not be able to take further legal action against the same trader on the same matter, either individually or collectively. By contrast, for a qualified entity to apply for an injunction, individual consumers do not need to consent to be represented by the qualified entity.
The qualified entity and the trader can negotiate the compensation to be awarded to the affected consumers. If the outcome of the negotiations is deemed unfair, the court may refuse the agreement. If not, it becomes binding on the trader and the qualified entity.
Conclusions
Compared to the previous law, the concept of “representative actions”, as introduced by Law no. 414/2023, is different and departs from previous litigation that was practised in Romania.
In the past, despite the many similar disputes between businesses and customers, national courts would regularly issue different rulings in similar proceedings. Therefore, the new regulation will have a major impact on the courts by enabling a large number of customers to collectively and cooperatively file identical or similar claims against the same company in the same dispute, similar to the well-known class action model in the US.
The recently adopted system addresses many procedural issues, allowing the settlement of a large number of consumer claims in the same dispute, potentially affecting thousands of contracts and injured consumers, and ultimately resulting in a mechanism that unifies court practices.
For more information on this law, the EU Directive it is based on, and judicial reform in Romania, contact your CMS client partner or these CMS experts: Horia Draghici and Andra Ionescu.
This article has been co-authored by Raluca Cretu.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 468 / 4669 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Un nou front juridic la Washington | Forty Management AG acționează România în judecată la ICSID. Schoenherr (Viena) și Daniel F. Visoiu sunt alături de reclamanți în acest arbitraj în care România este reprezentată printr-o structură instituțională complexă, care include și Banca Națională a României, într-o notă ce sugerează implicații financiare sau monetare deosebite
LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for a 3 - 6 years Attorney at Law | Dispute Resolution
Eșec de strategie juridică sau impas suveran? România, sancționată repetat în SUA pentru că ascunde activele ce pot fi executate de familia Micula. Săptămâna aceasta a fost obligată la plata unei amenzi noi, de 5,8 milioane de dolari, ridicând totalul penalităților la 21 milioane de dolari | Cazul Micula vs România a devenit „pacientul zero” într-o dezbatere juridică amplă care vizează arhitectura tratatelor de investiții în interiorul Uniunii Europene
RTPR obține definitiv peste 1,7 mil. € pentru un client din zona ONG, în urma anulării a 80 de contracte de vânzare într-un litigiu de proprietate cu peste 90 de pârâți | Alexandru Stănoiu (Counsel) și Șerban Nițulescu (Associate), în prim plan
România a câștigat arbitrajul ICSID cu Plaza Centers N.V. pentru Casa Radio și a scăpat de pretenții de 425 mil. €. Reclamanții rămân cu arbitrajul comercial inițiat la Londra de Ministerul Finanțelor, în care pretențiile României sunt de circa 2 miliarde €
Studiu LSEG Data & Analytics Q1 2026 | Piața globală de M&A a crescut cu 27% în primul trimestru, cu un avans spectaculos în Europa, unde a atins maximul ultimilor opt ani. CMS și DLA Piper continuă să stralucească în topul global al consultanților juridici, Clifford Chance și Schoenherr rămân active în clasamentele continentale, iar în Top 20 Europa de Est sunt vizibile doar două firme cu birou la București
Bondoc & Asociații anunță 10 promovări, inclusiv un nou Partener | Lucian Bondoc (Managing Partner): ”Firma va continua să urmeze aceeași abordare, în care recunoașterea meritocratică și echitabilă a expertizei și a contribuției la obiectivele noastre comune joacă un rol esențial”
LegiTeam - Oportunitate de carieră | Avocat definitiv – Achiziții publice & Infrastructură
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocat definitiv Dreptul muncii | Consultanță
O nouă serie de promovări la biroul Kinstellar din București. Șapte avocați din mai multe arii de practică fac un pas înainte în carieră. Theodor Artenie urcă pe poziția de Partner, iar Lidia Zărnescu și Răzvan Constantinescu devin Counsels | Iustinian Captariu, Office Managing Partner: ”Forța biroului nostru vine din talentul, colaborarea și angajamentul comun al întregii echipe”
Legiteam | Kinstellar is looking for a talented and ambitious lawyer to be part of our employment team in Bucharest
Filip & Company asistă Grupul DIGI Communications la intrarea pe piața telecomunicațiilor din Regatul Unit | Echipa, coordonată de Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partener)
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS






