
Complying with international sanctions: new regulatory measures proposed at the EU level. Do companies know their risks and how to mitigate them?
13 Februarie 2024
Laura Lică-Banu, Director, Silvia Iancuș, Manager, Financial Advisory, Corporate Forensic Services, Deloitte Romania, and Cătălin Chibzui, Manager, Reff & Associates | Deloitte LegalThe European Parliament and the EU Council reached a provisional political agreement on the harmonization and consolidation at a community level of offenses and punishments for breaching sanctions.
![]() |
Obligations to comply with international sanctions fall not only on the competent national authorities or on special categories of entities, but also on “any Romanian natural or legal person or located on the territory of Romania which must ensure compliance with the application of international sanctions, based on the normative acts that establish them”, according to the provisions of the Governmental Emergency Ordinance no. 202/2008 on the implementation of international sanctions, with subsequent amendments and additions. Among areas with relevant incidence in the application of international sanctions, the legislation mentions lending and financial activities, as well as other activities to which Law no. 129/2019 for prevention and combating of money laundering and terrorism financing, as well as for the modification and completion of some normative acts, with subsequent changes and additions, applies, import-export activities, the production of materials and goods subject to international sanctions regime, transport, customs clearance etc. In all these areas of activity, preventive measures are required, such as obtaining export licenses, compliance with commercial restrictions and embargoes, compliance with the provisions regarding trade within the European Union etc. Thus, in order to comply with the regulations issued at a national and European level, companies must implement an internal compliance program, consisting of implementing procedures aligned with legal provisions and internal processes and controls, on one hand, and, on the other hand, assigning responsibilities to specially designated professionals.
In practice, deficiencies frequently encountered in the application of international sanctions and, implicitly, of the compliance program are caused by insufficient knowledge or misinterpretation of the regulatory framework. Among these, the most common situations are those in which:
1. it is considered that the applicable legal provisions are only those adopted at the national level, and in this case, there where the provisions are not explicit, they are ignored. In this regard, EU decisions and regulations, as well as guidelines issued by the European Commission or the EU Council provide details on the obligations of individuals and entities in Romania and include clear rules of interpretation;
2. the internal compliance program is only partially implemented, for example, companies do not assign specific tasks to a person or a group of persons in the field of applying international sanctions, they do not formally adopt procedures in this field etc.;
3. the entities consider that their obligations are limited to only consulting the sanctions lists (name screening) and they do not proceed to the verification of the other parties within the end-to-end process, such as the authorizing officer, the intermediaries (banks, insurers, carriers, brokers, other front-companies etc.) or the final beneficiary of the transaction;
4. the screening of persons and entities is carried out at large time intervals from the date of the first check. The principle of applying the legislation is precisely that of immediately identifying the designated persons/entities, of those under their control or associated with them from among clients or business partners, to freeze their funds and economic resources and not to make them available directly or indirectly; notifying or, as the case may be, reporting these persons or entities to the authorities shall also be done as soon as possible from the date of official listing and identification;
5. the list of documents provided to justify the legality of a transaction is limited and does not include elements related to the verification of complying with the restrictions imposed by international sanctions – for example, the export license, the customs declarations etc.
Moreover, in addition to these deficiencies in the application of international sanctions regime, there are also entities that are not aware of the fact that they have obligations in this area. In response to this, the European Commission has initiated the adoption of a proposal for a directive to criminalise the breaching of EU sanctions as serious criminal offence.
Criminalisation of the non-application or deficient application of the international sanctions’ regime
Given that in recent years the restrictive measures enforced by the EU have been applied differently by member states, creating legislative loopholes that have allowed the avoidance of liability for certain entities and impediments in the application of the sanctioning regime, especially in the situations of groups of companies operating on the territory of several states, in December 2023, the European Parliament and the EU Council reached a provisional political agreement on the harmonization and consolidation at a community level of offenses and punishments for breaching sanctions.
Establishing a common legal framework for criminalizing the violation of EU restrictive measures, as well as standardizing cross-border criminal investigations and prosecutions will this way provide common grounds for the states to build their own legal framework. In this regard, the afore-mentioned agreement provides that the member states must criminalise a series of acts that result in the violation of sanctions, including the sale of goods subject to sanctions, carrying out transactions with states or entities included on the sanctions list, performing restricted or prohibited financial services, concealing assets owned by persons or entities subject to sanctions etc.
In order to ensure effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions, the agreement provides minimum limits of penalties margins, established according to the gravity of the crime, as follows: for natural persons, an imprisonment penalty of at least one or five years, by case, and for legal entities, monetary sanctions of at least 1% of the global turnover achieved in the previous financial year, with a maximum threshold starting at 5%. Moreover, in the case of legal entities, complementary sanctions are also provided, such as exclusion from access to public funding, including public procurement procedures, grants and concessions, lifting the right to conduct commercial activities, withdrawal of permits and authorizations for running activities that led to committing the offence, judicial control, the judicial liquidation and the closure of the units that served to commit the offence, as well as the confiscation of any income obtained as a result of breaching sanctions. At the same time, the agreement stipulates that the liability of legal entities does not exclude the possibility of criminal prosecution of natural persons involved in the violation of the restrictive measures’ regime.
Another important provision of the agreement refers to the establishment of a centralized EU database listing persons and entities subject to restrictive measures, a step that would facilitate their monitoring and identification, and would make bypassing restrictions difficult.
The establishment of a consolidated legislative framework at the EU level denotes the community commitment to strengthening the sanctions regime and comes as a response to emerging challenges in the field, as well as to the difficulties encountered in practice in creating an effective compliance framework. On the other hand, given the option of the EU legislators to shape this proposal in a directive-type legislative act, the transposition of this text into the national legislation of the member states will require careful coordination to ensure a balance between normative harmonization and national realities.
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
Articol 370 / 4584 | Următorul articol |
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |

Dr. Cosmin Vasile, singurul avocat român considerat de Lexology „Thought Leader” atât în practica de Arbitration, cât și de Commercial Litigation | Ce spune un practician român de top despre prezentul și viitorul arbitrajului: piața cere proceduri eficiente și previzibile, UE trebuie să clarifice circulația sentințelor arbitrale străine, iar finanțarea de către terți urcă pe agendă. Arbitrajul rămâne opțiunea asumată pentru dispute complexe, cu rezultate măsurabile
Clifford Chance Badea a asistat Nofar Energy la vânzarea participației în Rătești Solar și a împrumuturilor acordate ca acționar către Econergy International, pentru 45,6 milioane EUR
Mitel & Asociații se remarcă în practica de Concurență prin rigoare și sincronizare, oferind clienților remedii țintite, viteză procedurală și certitudine în calendarul de closing | Sub coordonarea partenerului Șerban Suchea, firma asigură trasee clare de conformare, maximizează predictibilitatea autorizărilor și păstrează direcția tranzacțiilor într-un peisaj normativ exigent și bine articulat
LegiTeam: Junior lawyers 0-1 years - Dispute Resolution Practice | GNP Guia Naghi and Partners
Lexology IP Rankings 2025 | Cine sunt profesioniștii care setează standardele pe o piață din ce în ce mai competitivă: Ana-Maria Baciu, Răzvan Dincă, Dana Blaer și Ciprian Dragomir, printre avocații a căror poziționare confirmă maturizarea sectorului local și relevanța lui în arhitectura regională a proprietății intelectuale
CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for junior lawyers
Radiografia unui an intens în practica de Employment la KPMG Legal – Toncescu și Asociații | Arhitectura normelor de dreptul muncii arată ca un șantier în lucru: reglementări noi, intenții bune, dar și intersecții nerezolvate între acte normative, zone fără busolă și practici care alunecă în interpretări divergente. De vorbă cu membrii echipei despre provocările perioadei, proiectele cheie și prioritățile clienților, în linie cu valul normativ
Lexology Capital Markets Rankings 2025 | Cine sunt avocații români care se remarcă în practica de piețe de capital: Anca Simeria (partener, Popescu & Asociații) este considerată „Thought Leaders”. Zsuzsa Csiki (partener, Kinstellar), evidențiată pe segmentul de ”Structured Finance”, iar Loredana Chițu (partener Dentons, în secțiunea ”Debt & Equity”. Un semnal că piața locală poate seta standarde și concura cu jurisdicții consacrate
Practica de M&A de la Volciuc-Ionescu accelerează într-o piață mai activă, unde conformarea multiplă și mecanismele sofisticate de preț ̸ structurare ridică miza juridică. “O tranzacție este cu adevărat de succes dacă, după closing, integrarea noii afaceri decurge fluent, sinergiile preconizate se realizează efectiv și nu apar probleme majore care să-i erodeze valoarea”, spun avocații | În spatele fiecărui mandat finalizat se află o combinație atent dozată de expertiză, colaborare și reziliență
Filip & Company asistă OH Holding Limited în finalizarea tranzacției prin care fondul de investiții intră în acționariatul Lensa. Echipa, coordonată de Alina Stancu Bîrsan (partener)
Filip & Company a asistat Victoriabank în finalizarea achiziției OCN “Microinvest” SRL în Republica Moldova. Alina Stancu Bîrsan (partener) a coordonat echipa
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocati stagiari promoția septembrie 2025 | Litigii
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...