ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?

17 Octombrie 2022   |   Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.

 
 

One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.

To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.

1.          Types of lands

The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:

(i)         from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);

(ii)       from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;

(iii)      from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.

2.          General construction rule

As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.

If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),

(i)         the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;

(ii)       no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.

3.          Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects

Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:

(i)         land has fertility class III, IV and V; and

(ii)       land does not exceed 50 ha.

Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.

4.          Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha

Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?

The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.

Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:

(i)            according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;

(ii)          all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);

(iii)        PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;

(iv)        if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;

(v)          generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;

(vi)        very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.

Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.

 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 936 / 4574
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Early Game investește 1,5 mil. € în marketplace-ul de job-uri YOX. Echipa DLA Piper România a asigurat asistența juridică și a coordonat echipa internațională implicată în tranzacție
Radiografia unui an intens în practica de Employment la KPMG Legal – Toncescu și Asociații | Arhitectura normelor de dreptul muncii arată ca un șantier în lucru: reglementări noi, intenții bune, dar și intersecții nerezolvate între acte normative, zone fără busolă și practici care alunecă în interpretări divergente. De vorbă cu membrii echipei despre provocările perioadei, proiectele cheie și prioritățile clienților, în linie cu valul normativ
Mitel & Asociatii recruteaza avocati stagiari
Saga „Micula vs. România” foarfecă bugetul | Frații Micula cer a treia serie de sancțiuni în SUA împotriva României, după ce administrația de la București a refuzat să ofere date precise despre bunuri și conturi ce pot fi executate. Statul ar trebui să mai plătească penalități de 5,8 mil. USD după ce a fost deja sancționată cu cca. 15 mil. USD în ultimii 4 ani. White & Case, Dentons și F.A. Vasquez accelerează demersurile de executare; statul este apărat de Foley Hoag și SLV Legal
Într-un an dominat de pragmatism, Mitel & Asociații menține ritmul în M&A: echipă compactă, coordonare directă a partenerilor, continuitate și seriozitate în dosarele complexe, proiecte din industrii cu cerere solidă și un mod de lucru centrat pe integrare, calendar și echilibru între părți | Avocații spun că procedurile pentru investiții străine impun răbdare, dar nu schimbă cursul, într-o piață care rămâne activă, dar mai atentă la detalii
Lawyer – Associate ̸ Senior Associate (1-6 years) | Banking & Finance | Reff & Associates
NNDKP a luat toate premiile pentru jurisdicția noastră la gala ‘Benchmark Litigation Europe Awards 2025’ | Casa de avocați a primit titlul de ‘Firma de avocatură a anului’, iar Emil Bivolaru a urcat pe podium la catogoria ‘Avocatul anului în România’ în materia soluționării disputelor
CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for junior lawyers
Lexology Capital Markets Rankings 2025 | Cine sunt avocații români care se remarcă în practica de piețe de capital: Anca Simeria (partener, Popescu & Asociații) este considerată „Thought Leaders”. Zsuzsa Csiki (partener, Kinstellar), evidențiată pe segmentul de ”Structured Finance”, iar Loredana Chițu (partener Dentons, în secțiunea ”Debt & Equity”. Un semnal că piața locală poate seta standarde și concura cu jurisdicții consacrate
BOHÂLȚEANU ȘI ASOCIAȚII recrutează avocați stagiari cu 0-3 ani experienta in profesie
ZRVP a asistat UniCredit Bank în materia relațiilor de muncă în contextul fuziunii cu Alpha Bank Romania. Cătălin Micu (partener) a coordonat proiectul, alți trei avocați, în prim plan | Buna colaborare cu factorii cheie din proiect și focusul pe comunicarea eficientă în cadrul organizațiilor implicate a făcut ca toate etapele planificate să fie implementate și inerentele provocări să fie depășite cu succes
GNP Guia Naghi and Partners is looking for a talented lawyer | Technology & Data protection
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...