Developing Renewables in Romania: PUZ or Pass?
17 Octombrie 2022 Mihaela Nyerges, Partener - Vlăsceanu, Nyerges & Partners
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate.
| |
One of the most frequent questions asked there days by renewables investors and developers is whether PUZ is still required for developing small renewable power projects in Romania (below 50 ha). The relevance of this question is huge as the answer impacts on the duration of the development process with up to 9 months.
To answer, brief preliminary comments should be made regarding the general construction permitting rules, depending on the various types of lands.
1. Types of lands
The following lands qualifications are relevant for the current topic:
(i) from the perspective of their location, the lands can be (a) located intra-muros (within the buildable perimeter of the respective territorial administrative unit) or (b) located extra-muros (outside such perimeter);
(ii) from the perspective of their destination, the lands can be, among others, (a) agricultural lands or (b) yards-constructions lands;
(iii) from the perspective of their fertility class, the agricultural lands are split into 5 fertility classes, ranging from very fertile land (Class I) to very low fertile land (Class V); the fertility class is established based soil analysis made by experts within the county Office of Pedological Studies.
2. General construction rule
As a general rule, all constructions may be erected only on lands (i) located intra-muros and (ii) qualifying as “yards-constructions”.
If the targeted land qualifies as extra-muros and agricultural land (which is typically the case with the land suitable for renewable projects),
(i) the land should be first requalified from extra-muros into intra-muros land by means of a PUZ;
(ii) no additional formalities should be done for converting the land from agricultural land to “yards-construction” land, as such conversion occurs automatically through the issuance of the building permit.
3. Exception dedicated to renewable energy projects
Late July this year, an exception from the above rule was adopted, expressly allowing the construction of renewable power generation projects on extra-murros lands if the following conditions are met:
(i) land has fertility class III, IV and V; and
(ii) land does not exceed 50 ha.
Therefore, projects falling within the above limitations no longer need to obtain requalification of the land from extra-muros to intra-murros land through a PUZ.
4. Need of a PUZ in case of renewable projects below 50 ha
Therefore, do we still need or not a PUZ for developing renewable on land with fertility class III, IV and V which does not exceeds 50 ha?
The practice of the authorities seems to differ: there are local authorities that request a PUZ for the issuance of the building permit, and authorities that no longer impose such an obligation through the urban planning certificate. We have also encountered a case where the authority changed its mind after having issued an urban planning certificate whereby no PUZ was requested.
Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that PUZ has multiple roles, not just the introduction of land into intra-murros area, as explained below:
(i) according to the general construction law (with certain exceptions not applicable hereto), the building permit may be issued only if (a) there is an urban documentation approved regarding the respective land, setting out the legal, technical and economical regime of the land and (b) the envisaged construction is compatible with the rules set out by the respective urban documentation;
(ii) all communes and towns in Romania must have an urban documentation approved – namely a general urban plan (“PUG”) adopted by the local authorities setting out (a) the function of each land (such as residential, industrial etc.) and (b) the applicable urbanism parameters and limitations (such as land occupation percentage, land occupation coefficient, height regime, etc.);
(iii) PUG is a sufficient urbanism documentation for the issuance of a building permit if (a) it provides the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land and (b) the envisaged project is compatible with the regime set out thereby;
(iv) if (a) the PUG does not provide the legal, technical and economical regime of the targeted land or (b) the envisaged construction is not compatible with the rules set out by the PUG for the targeted land or (c) there is no PUG in place (for example, it was never approved, it expired, it was cancelled in court or suspended), the developer must obtain a zonal urban plan (“PUZ”) whereby to adopt/amend the urbanism rules so that they are compatible with the project;
(v) generally, PUGs do not regulate extra-muros land or do not establish an urbanism function/regime compatible with renewable projects;
(vi) very recently, a new exception from the need to adopt an urbanism documentation was added in case of other specific types of constructions allowed on extra murros land.
Further to the above, PUZs are still needed for developing renewable projects on lands below 50 ha in order to establish the function and urbanism parameters of the respective land that are compatible with the envisaged project. Nevertheless, a case-by-case assessment should be made regarding the PUG rules applicable on the respective land. Such assessment should be made by the consultants of the developer, without simply relying on the assessment made by the local authorities when issuing the urbanism certificate.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 1011 / 4649 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
LegiTeam: CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for: Associate | Commercial group (3-4 years definitive ̸ qualified lawyer)
Filip & Company asistă Continental în vânzarea OESL către Regent. Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partner) a coordonat echipa
Cum a fost integrată Harvey, platforma de inteligență artificială concepută pentru domeniul juridic, într-o firmă de avocatură, fără să schimbe esența profesiei | Experiența Filip & Company, detaliată de Alexandru Bîrsan (Co-Managing Partner) și Andreea Piștea (Project Manager): AI-ul devine un avantaj competitiv atunci când scurtează drumul către analiza de substanță și conturarea strategiei, dar rămâne sigur și util doar într-un cadru în care avocatul validează, decide și își asumă rezultatul
Chambers Global 2026 | RTPR rămâne singura firmă de avocați listată pe prima poziție în ambele arii de practică analizate: Corporate ̸ M&A și Banking & Finance. Filip & Company este în prima bandă în Corporate ̸ M&A. Firmele care au cei mai mulți avocați evidențiați sunt RTPR (9), Filip & Company (8), CMS (6) și Clifford Chance Badea (5)
Bulboacă & Asociații finalizeaza o noua tranzactie de referinta in sectorul medical, dupa securizarea avizelor CEISD si ale Consiliului Concurentei. Echipa de proiect, coordonată de Roxana Tiutiu (Partener)
Clifford Chance a asistat BEI, BERD și BCR în acordul de finanțare semnat cu Scatec pentru dezvoltarea și exploatarea unei centrale solare cu o capacitate de 189,7 MWp. Echipă transfrontalieră cu 6 avocați din București în prim plan
Clifford Chance Badea a asistat Electro-Alfa International în IPO-ul de 580 milioane RON, una dintre cele mai de succes listări realizate de o companie antreprenorială din România. Echipa a fost condusă de Radu Ropotă (Partener)
Eversheds Sutherland își întărește linia de arbitraj la București prin cooptarea Luminiței Popa ca partener | Un nume de referință în arbitrajul internațional revine într-o echipă integrată, după perioada dedicată practicii independente
ICC Arbitration Breakfast revine în România cu cea de-a doua ediție - 18 martie, în București
În litigiile fiscale, Artenie, Secrieru & Partners este asociată cu rigoarea și eficiența, grație unei combinații rare de viziune, metodă și capacitate de execuție în dosare grele. De vorbă cu coordonatorii practicii despre noul ritm al inspecțiilor, reîncadrările tot mai frecvente și importanța unei apărări unitare, susținute de specialiști și expertize, într-un context fiscal tot mai imprevizibil
NNDKP obține o decizie semnificativă pentru litigiile privind prețurile de transfer din partea de vest a României. Echipă mixtă, cu avocați din Timișoara și București, în proiect
ZRVP și anatomia unei investigații interne conduse impecabil | O discuție cu Doru Cosmin Ursu (Managing Associate) despre metodă, rigoare probatorie și coordonare strânsă între specializări, în mandate sensibile, inclusiv transfrontaliere, care oferă managementului claritate și opțiuni concrete de acțiune
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





