
CMS | Romania transposes EU law on representative actions
23 Ianuarie 2024
CMS RomâniaFor more information on this law, the EU Directive it is based on, and judicial reform in Romania, contact your CMS client partner or these CMS experts: Horia Draghici and Andra Ionescu.
![]() |
On 23 December 2023, new legislation entered into force in Romania on the conduct of representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers, which transposes the EU Directive 2020/1828.
The newly regulated concept of representative actions will enable litigation to proceed more rapidly and cost-effectively, especially against large companies. As a result, the act could potentially change business in Romania through its approach to consumer disputes.
Representative action
“Representative action” is defined by the law as an action to protect the collective interests of consumers that is brought by a qualified entity as a plaintiff on behalf of consumers to seek injunctive relief, remedial relief, or both. In other words, the law allows qualified entities, whether private entities or independent public authorities, to act on behalf of multiple consumers.
The newly regulated concept of representative actions will enable litigation to proceed more rapidly and cost-effectively, especially against large companies. As a result, the act could potentially change business in Romania through its approach to consumer disputes.
Representative action
“Representative action” is defined by the law as an action to protect the collective interests of consumers that is brought by a qualified entity as a plaintiff on behalf of consumers to seek injunctive relief, remedial relief, or both. In other words, the law allows qualified entities, whether private entities or independent public authorities, to act on behalf of multiple consumers.
Court representation – qualified entities
For an entity to be a “qualified one”, it must fulfil some specific requirements, such as: (i) it must be a legal entity that can prove that it has carried out, during the 12 months preceding the application for designation, a public activity in relation to the protection of consumer interests; (ii) it must have a legitimate interest in protecting the interests of consumers; (iii) it must be a non-profit entity.
Possible remedies
The remedies available for the benefit of consumers are diverse, including damage, repair, replacement, price reduction or termination, varying on a case-by-case basis.
Consumer consent
In order to be represented collectively by the qualified entity for the purpose of obtaining redress, consumers must give their written consent within 30 days of the beginning of the action. This implies that consumers concerned will not be able to take further legal action against the same trader on the same matter, either individually or collectively. By contrast, for a qualified entity to apply for an injunction, individual consumers do not need to consent to be represented by the qualified entity.
The qualified entity and the trader can negotiate the compensation to be awarded to the affected consumers. If the outcome of the negotiations is deemed unfair, the court may refuse the agreement. If not, it becomes binding on the trader and the qualified entity.
Conclusions
Compared to the previous law, the concept of “representative actions”, as introduced by Law no. 414/2023, is different and departs from previous litigation that was practised in Romania.
In the past, despite the many similar disputes between businesses and customers, national courts would regularly issue different rulings in similar proceedings. Therefore, the new regulation will have a major impact on the courts by enabling a large number of customers to collectively and cooperatively file identical or similar claims against the same company in the same dispute, similar to the well-known class action model in the US.
The recently adopted system addresses many procedural issues, allowing the settlement of a large number of consumer claims in the same dispute, potentially affecting thousands of contracts and injured consumers, and ultimately resulting in a mechanism that unifies court practices.
For more information on this law, the EU Directive it is based on, and judicial reform in Romania, contact your CMS client partner or these CMS experts: Horia Draghici and Andra Ionescu.
This article has been co-authored by Raluca Cretu.
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
Articol 354 / 4555 | Următorul articol |
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |

BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Lexology Energy Rankings 2025 | Cine sunt avocații români care s-au remarcat într-o practică devenită, în ultimii ani, un adevărat laborator de inovație juridică: ZRVP, CMS, TZA și NNDKP au o amprentă bine conturată în Oil & Gas. NNDKP strălucește și în Power & Electricity, unde se remarcă și Kinstellar, dar și în Renewables
ANALIZĂ | Gabriel Resources a deschis o procedură de anulare a hotărârii ICSID prin care Tribunalul arbitral a respins cererea de peste 3 mld. USD privind controversatul proiect minier de la Roșia Montană, iar România a răspuns cu un Contramemoriu care demontează acuzațiile și atacă frontal strategia reclamanților. Dacă statul ar pierde, impactul ar fi devastator pentru finanțele publice și ar compromite rezultatele măsurilor pe care guvernul Bolojan încearcă să le implementeze
CMS | Join Our Team: Tax Consultant - Tax Department
Ana-Maria Baciu, avocatul din România cu cele mai multe nominalizări la gala Legal 500 CEE Awards 2025: Intellectual Property Lawyer of the Year, Romania Lawyer of the Year și CEE Partner of the Year. Astfel de validări contribuie nu doar la consolidarea brandului său personal, ci și la repoziționarea avocaturii de business din România ca un partener credibil, capabil să ofere consultanță sofisticată clienților internaționali
Filip & Company a asistat statul român prin Ministerul Finanțelor în contractarea unor plasamente private sub forma de împrumuturi în valoare de peste 2 miliarde de euro | Echipa, coordonată de Alexandra Manciulea (partener)
Ce case de avocatură se bat pentru titlul de Law Firm of the Year în România la gala Benchmark Litigation Europe Awards 2025 | Sorina Olaru, Octavian Popescu, Dan Cristea și Cosmin Vasile, printre avocații aflați pe lista scurtă pentru titlul de titlul de Litigator of the Year. Emil Bivolaru (partener NNDKP), nominalizat și la categoria Central & Eastern Europe Litigator of the Year
Finanțele caută avocați pentru litigii arbitrale investiționale internaționale judecate potrivit regulilor de arbitraj UNCITRAL și ICSID | Acorduri-cadru de reprezentare juridică a României semnate, pentru 4 ani, cu cel mult 4 firme pentru fiecare lot
LegiTeam: Lawyer - Dispute Resolution and Employment | GNP Guia Naghi and Partners
ITR EMEA Tax Awards 2025 | Băncilă Diaconu și Asociații, Popescu & Asociații, CMS și Schoenherr concurează pentru titlul ”Firma anului în România în domeniul taxelor”. Popescu & Asociații are două nominalizări în jurisdicția locală și este, alături de NNDKP, pe lista scurtă pentru distincția ”Firma anului în dispute fiscale”. TZA, printre finaliste în competitia pentru ”Transfer Pricing Firm of the Year”
Bondoc & Asociații acordă asistență pentru 5 proiecte eoliene și solare în cadrul celei de-a doua licitații CfD din România | Echipa a fost coordonată de Cosmin Stăvaru (Partener), susținut de Raluca Catargiu (Senior Associate)
Bulboacă & Asociatii caută un Avocat Colaborator pentru Echipa de Tranzacții de Elită (Corporate ̸ M&A)
Bulboacă & Asociatii caută avocați apecializați în Drept Bancar & Finanțări | Practica Noastră de Referinţă
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...