ZRP
Tuca Zbarcea & Asociatii

Law-Now: Romania amends Fiscal Procedure Code and its high court rules on statute of limitation

23 Decembrie 2020   |   CMS Romania

For more information on the above changes, contact CMS experts Roxana Popel, Andrei Tercu and Ramona Tudor.

 
 
On 18 December 2020, the Romanian President promulgated an amendment on the law on fiscal procedures and in the Official Gazette it was published a High Court of Cassation and Justice ruling on the five-year statute of limitations for corporate income tax.

Amendments to the Fiscal Procedure Code

Romania enacted Law no. 295/2020 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 207/2015 regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code (“Law 295/2020”). Published in the Official Gazette (no. 1266/21.12.2020) and scheduled to enter into force on 24 December 2020, the law contains, amongst others, the following provisions:

→    Transfer of the administrative challenges departments: Specialised departments dealing with administrative challenges have been transferred and will function as a specialised structure at the level of the Ministry of Finance. Until now, the National Agency for Fiscal Administration contained the relevant departments handling administrative challenges.


→    Re-examination of administrative challenges: A new option has been introduced for taxpayers to have their administrative-challenge resolutions revisited before going to court. Taxpayers can request a re-examination of the tax decision for solving an administrative challenge, under certain conditions. For example, when the said tax decision does not to make reference to legal provisions that would fundamentally change the solution, the issuance of a decision by the Central Tax Commission, the issuance of interpretations by the high court, or an ECJ decision contrary to the decision to settle their challenge.

→    New annulment causes for fiscal administrative acts: The following additional annulment causes for administrative acts issued by the tax authorities have been introduced:

    ♦   When presenting arguments, the tax authority must consider the prior written opinions or solutions issued by tax authorities or courts, if these were presented to the tax authority prior to the issuance of the administrative act.
    ♦   The tax authority need not comply with the arguments of the tax decision solving the administrative challenge if a new administrative act was issued.
    ♦   Issuance of the tax audit report and the tax decision after the finalisation of the tax audit.
    ♦   The tax authority issues administrative acts or findings in connection with the crime related to the evidence on the taxable base or customs value subject to tax or a customs audit.

→    Requests of taxpayers for interest due by the tax authorities: The statute of limitation is five years for the taxpayer’s request for interest related to amounts to be reimbursed or refunded from the state budget. The previous provisions made no reference to a term.

→    Non-declaration penalty: The amount of the non-declaration penalty is reduced by 75% if the taxpayer settles his debts within the legal deadline. Previously, taxpayers submitted a written request for such a reduction.

→    Non-obligation to appoint a tax agent: Non-resident taxpayers that opt to communicate with the tax authorities through electronic means are not obliged to appoint a Romanian tax agent.

→    The tax registration code: This could also be used to fulfil tax obligations prior to the tax registration date.

→    If the legal person ceases after the start of the tax inspection, the tax inspection will continue and apply to the successors of that person: The tax claim will be established in the name of the successors. If there are no successors, the tax inspection will cease.

→    New conditions for suspension of a tax inspection: Suspension of a tax inspection may be ordered:
        ♦   to perform checks on the other members of the tax group or single tax group;
        ♦   in the event that the tax inspection body is notified or is informed that a legal proceeding is pending against the taxpayer based on evidence on how his taxable base was determined (i.e. the taxable base subject of the tax inspection) or if financial-accounting records of the taxpayer were collected by the criminal investigation body.

→    The taxpayer may file an administrative challenge against the decision to suspend the tax inspection.

Statute of limitations for corporate income tax

On 18 December 2020, Decision no. 21/14.09.2020 of the Romanian High Court was published in the Official Gazette. The decision states that the five-year statute of limitation period for corporate income tax begins on 1 January of the following year in which the taxable profit was realised.

This judgment solves the past problems arising from the practice of tax authorities (and supported by opinions issued by the Ministry of Finance), which reported the start of the statue-of-limitation period from 1 January of the following year in which taxpayers had the obligation to file their annual tax return.  Since the deadline is 25 March of the following year, the tax authorities expanded the statute of limitation period by one year for a total of six years.

Although this decision refers to the statute of limitation for corporate income tax under the old Fiscal Procedure Code, it is relevant for ongoing or future tax inspections up to 2016 and ongoing or pending administrative or court dealings during the same period.

This decision of the high court is binding for both Romanian courts and the tax authorities from the moment of its publication in the Official Gazette, which took place on 18 December 2020.

For more information on the above changes, contact CMS experts Roxana Popel, Andrei Tercu and Ramona Tudor.
 
 

PNSA

 
 

ARTICOLE PE ACEEASI TEMA

ARTICOLE DE ACELASI AUTOR


 

Ascunde Reclama
 
 

POSTEAZA UN COMENTARIU


Nume *
Email (nu va fi publicat) *
Comentariu *
Cod de securitate*







* campuri obligatorii


Articol 3569 / 4533
 

Ascunde Reclama
 
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
RTPR obține, printr-o hotărâre definitivă, reducerea cu 85% a amenzii aplicate de Consiliul Concurenței unei agenții media, după un „roller coaster” juridic de 10 ani. Complexitatea speței, accentuată de necesitatea de a gestiona aspectele de natură tehnică referitoare la calculul veniturilor reale ale unei agenții media, cu excluderea sumelor refacturate clienților acesteia | Echipa asistă clientul și în cadrul procedurilor legale prin care să poată obține compensațiile care i se cuvin în contextul lipsirii acestuia de o sumă importantă de bani pe o perioadă îndelungată
CMS | Join Our Team: Tax Consultant - Tax Department
Filip & Company a asistat Booster Capital în achiziția unei participații în Artesana cu o chipă de avocați coordonată de Alexandru Bîrsan (managing partner) și Andreea Bănică (counsel). RTPR a fost de partea vânzătorului ROCA Investments, iar Andronic & Partners a asistat Artesana şi pe fondatorii acesteia
Clifford Chance a asistat Electrica în emisiunea istorică de obligațiuni verzi lansată pe piețele externe, în valoare de 500 milioane Euro. Avocați din București și Londra, în echipa de proiect, coordonată de partenerii Mădălina Rachieru-Postolache și Kate Vyvyan
LegiTeam: Atorney at Law (0 - 2 years) - Dispute Resolution | Reff & Associates
Filip & Company a asistat Ministerul Finanțelor Publice în emisiunea de obligațiuni în valoare de 4,7 miliarde de euro | Monica Stătescu (partener): ”Cererea puternică și condițiile de finanțare semnificativ îmbunătățite arată că România este percepută tot mai mult ca un emitent stabil și credibil”
LegiTeam: Lawyer - Corporate M&A | Reff & Associates
Legal 500 - Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2025 | Clifford Chance, Filip & Company și Băncilă, Diaconu și Asociații sunt pe lista scurtă pentru titlul de ”Firma anului în România”. Horea Popescu (CMS), Ruxandra Bologa (NNDKP), Madalina Rachieru-Postolache (Clifford Chance) și Ana-Maria Baciu (Baciu Partners) printre candidații la titlul ”Romania Lawyer of the Year”. Alți 18 avocați români și 8 firme locale concurează la premiile regionale
Finanțările sindicalizate își păstrează poziția solidă, iar club-deal-urile câștigă teren pe piață, spun avocații din practica de Banking & Finance de la NNDKP | Valentin Voinescu (Partener): ”Am remarcat o creștere a interesului din partea fondurilor de investiții și a creditorilor non-bancari. Profilul clientului a evoluat: companiile sunt mai bine informate, mai receptive la structuri mixte și tot mai interesate de optimizarea costurilor și a structurii de capital”
Cei mai buni profesioniști în domeniul brevetelor, văzuți de ”IAM Patent 1000 - 2025” | NNDKP, ZRVP și Dincă & Speciac au cea mai bună poziționare, iar Mușat & Asociații și Baciu Partners sunt în prim plan. Ce firme au cei mai mulți avocați listați și ce spun clienții despre aceștia
De vorbă cu studenții admiși în fruntea listei la Facultatea de Drept a Universității București | Liana Ștefana Bonca, 85 de puncte, printre primii intrați în anul 2022: “Facultatea vine cu provocări însemnate, iar examenele te testează în moduri neașteptate, cerând mai mult decât ai crezut vreodată că poți oferi. Totuși, în mijlocul acestui tumult și a nesiguranței cu care încă mă confrunt, am credința profundă că munca și pasiunea pot transforma chiar și cele mai grele obstacole în realizări”
Women in Business Law EMEA Awards 2025 | CMS câștigă titlul de de “Firma anului în România”. Un avocat in-house local, desemnat ”General Counsel of the Year” pentru regiune
 
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
  • BizBanker

  • BizLeader

      in curand...
  • SeeNews

    in curand...