Law-Now: Romania amends Fiscal Procedure Code and its high court rules on statute of limitation
23 Decembrie 2020 CMS Romania
For more information on the above changes, contact CMS experts Roxana Popel, Andrei Tercu and Ramona Tudor.
On 18 December 2020, the Romanian President promulgated an amendment on the law on fiscal procedures and in the Official Gazette it was published a High Court of Cassation and Justice ruling on the five-year statute of limitations for corporate income tax.
Amendments to the Fiscal Procedure Code
Romania enacted Law no. 295/2020 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 207/2015 regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code (“Law 295/2020”). Published in the Official Gazette (no. 1266/21.12.2020) and scheduled to enter into force on 24 December 2020, the law contains, amongst others, the following provisions:
→ Transfer of the administrative challenges departments: Specialised departments dealing with administrative challenges have been transferred and will function as a specialised structure at the level of the Ministry of Finance. Until now, the National Agency for Fiscal Administration contained the relevant departments handling administrative challenges.
Amendments to the Fiscal Procedure Code
Romania enacted Law no. 295/2020 for the amendment and completion of Law no. 207/2015 regarding the Fiscal Procedure Code (“Law 295/2020”). Published in the Official Gazette (no. 1266/21.12.2020) and scheduled to enter into force on 24 December 2020, the law contains, amongst others, the following provisions:
→ Transfer of the administrative challenges departments: Specialised departments dealing with administrative challenges have been transferred and will function as a specialised structure at the level of the Ministry of Finance. Until now, the National Agency for Fiscal Administration contained the relevant departments handling administrative challenges.
→ Re-examination of administrative challenges: A new option has been introduced for taxpayers to have their administrative-challenge resolutions revisited before going to court. Taxpayers can request a re-examination of the tax decision for solving an administrative challenge, under certain conditions. For example, when the said tax decision does not to make reference to legal provisions that would fundamentally change the solution, the issuance of a decision by the Central Tax Commission, the issuance of interpretations by the high court, or an ECJ decision contrary to the decision to settle their challenge.
→ New annulment causes for fiscal administrative acts: The following additional annulment causes for administrative acts issued by the tax authorities have been introduced:
♦ When presenting arguments, the tax authority must consider the prior written opinions or solutions issued by tax authorities or courts, if these were presented to the tax authority prior to the issuance of the administrative act.
♦ The tax authority need not comply with the arguments of the tax decision solving the administrative challenge if a new administrative act was issued.
♦ Issuance of the tax audit report and the tax decision after the finalisation of the tax audit.
♦ The tax authority issues administrative acts or findings in connection with the crime related to the evidence on the taxable base or customs value subject to tax or a customs audit.
→ Requests of taxpayers for interest due by the tax authorities: The statute of limitation is five years for the taxpayer’s request for interest related to amounts to be reimbursed or refunded from the state budget. The previous provisions made no reference to a term.
→ Non-declaration penalty: The amount of the non-declaration penalty is reduced by 75% if the taxpayer settles his debts within the legal deadline. Previously, taxpayers submitted a written request for such a reduction.
→ Non-obligation to appoint a tax agent: Non-resident taxpayers that opt to communicate with the tax authorities through electronic means are not obliged to appoint a Romanian tax agent.
→ The tax registration code: This could also be used to fulfil tax obligations prior to the tax registration date.
→ If the legal person ceases after the start of the tax inspection, the tax inspection will continue and apply to the successors of that person: The tax claim will be established in the name of the successors. If there are no successors, the tax inspection will cease.
→ New conditions for suspension of a tax inspection: Suspension of a tax inspection may be ordered:
♦ to perform checks on the other members of the tax group or single tax group;
♦ in the event that the tax inspection body is notified or is informed that a legal proceeding is pending against the taxpayer based on evidence on how his taxable base was determined (i.e. the taxable base subject of the tax inspection) or if financial-accounting records of the taxpayer were collected by the criminal investigation body.
→ The taxpayer may file an administrative challenge against the decision to suspend the tax inspection.
Statute of limitations for corporate income tax
On 18 December 2020, Decision no. 21/14.09.2020 of the Romanian High Court was published in the Official Gazette. The decision states that the five-year statute of limitation period for corporate income tax begins on 1 January of the following year in which the taxable profit was realised.
This judgment solves the past problems arising from the practice of tax authorities (and supported by opinions issued by the Ministry of Finance), which reported the start of the statue-of-limitation period from 1 January of the following year in which taxpayers had the obligation to file their annual tax return. Since the deadline is 25 March of the following year, the tax authorities expanded the statute of limitation period by one year for a total of six years.
Although this decision refers to the statute of limitation for corporate income tax under the old Fiscal Procedure Code, it is relevant for ongoing or future tax inspections up to 2016 and ongoing or pending administrative or court dealings during the same period.
This decision of the high court is binding for both Romanian courts and the tax authorities from the moment of its publication in the Official Gazette, which took place on 18 December 2020.
For more information on the above changes, contact CMS experts Roxana Popel, Andrei Tercu and Ramona Tudor.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 3721 / 4685 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
NNDKP a asistat Raiffeisen Bank România în legătură cu finanțarea grupului Monza Ares în vederea achiziției Brain Institute și integrării acestuia în structura grupului | Alina Radu (Partener) și Cătălina Dan (Asociat Senior), în prim plan
Mitel & Asociații a asistat vanzatorii în tranzacția prin care Grupul Monza Ares, susținut de Highlander Partners, a preluat centrul privat de neurochirurgie Brain Institute | Mădălina Mitel, coordonatoarea echipei de proiect: ”Pentru noi, un mandat de M&A reușit este acela în care soluția juridică susține logica economică a tranzacției și permite părților să meargă mai departe cu un proiect viabil”
NNDKP a asistat grupul PPC în procesul de negociere pentru încheierea noilor contracte colective de muncă | Roxana Abrașu (Partener) și Daniel Stăncescu (Managing Associate), în prim plan
RTPR asistă Silcotub la achiziția Artrom Steel Tubes. Echipa, coordonată de Mihai Ristici (Partener) și Vlad Stamatescu (Counsel)
Florian Nițu (PNSA), singurul avocat din România aflat în cursa pentru titlul „CEE Partner of the Year” la ”Legal 500 Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2026” - nu doar într-un an mai bun, ci după două decenii de consecvență în excelență: „Avocatul a devenit, în fapt, un ‘integrator’ în proiectele complexe, responsabil de alinierea componentelor juridice, comerciale și operaționale ale unei tranzacții. Clientul este azi un partener strategic, sofisticat și continuu implicat în gestionarea serviciului avocațial”
Mandatele sofisticate, în care soluțiile juridice trebuie dublate de înțelegerea mecanismelor economice, confirmă forța practicii de Insolvență & Restructurare a ZRVP, evidențiată în Tier 1 de Legal 500 | Alexandru Iorgulescu (Partener): ”Pot spune că specific practicii noastre sunt mandatele complexe ce reclamă soluții inovatoare, unde lucrăm adesea pe drumuri ‘neumblate’ și în care problemele de dreptul insolvenței se întrepătrund cu cele civile, societare, administrativ-fiscale”
NNDKP a asistat Grupul Saica în legătură cu achiziția Grupului Thimm. Echipa, cordonată de Gabriela Cacerea (Partener)
18 firme de avocatură și 22 de avocați din România, pe lista scurtă pentru Legal 500 - Central and Eastern Europe Awards 2026. Avocați de la Filip & Company, CMS, RTPR, NNDKP, TZA, Bondoc & Asociații și Schoenherr intră în competiție pentru premii regionale, iar Florian Nițu (PNSA) este nominalizat la titlul de ”CEE Partner of the Year”. Doi legal manageri concurează la titlul de ”In-house Lawyer of the Year” în CEE
Ritm alert, tranzacții de referință și expertiză recunoscută | Practica de Energie & Resurse Naturale a RTPR, Tier 1 în Legal 500, gestionează integrat mandate care combină M&A, finanțări verzi, autorizare și reglementare, oferind clienților internaționali și locali suport în proiecte cu miză ridicată. De vorbă cu partenerul Bogdan Cordoș despre tendințele anului 2026, interesul investitorilor și mandatele relevante
ZRVP organizează în data de 11 iunie 2026 dezbaterea „Contractul de antrepriză: de la FIDIC la HG 1 ̸ 2018 – evoluție, adaptare sau compromis?”
League Tables of Legal Advisors → Cum au văzut analiștii Mergermarket piața de M&A și activitatea firmelor de avocați în primul trimestru din 2026 | Numărul tranzacțiilor a scăzut, dar valoarea cumulată are un avans de 20%. Clifford Chance, DLA Piper și CMS se remarcă la nivel global și în Europa. O activitate mai puțin intensă în CEE, cu România printre cele mai active piețe din regiune
LegiTeam: Reff & Associates is looking for a Junior Associate | Dispute Resolution
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





