CMS | Romanian trade marks can be cancelled by the OSIM
27 Ianuarie 2023 CMS Romania
For more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
| |
As of 14 January 2023, requests can be made with the Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trade Marks (OSIM) to cancel trade marks by using an administrative-jurisdictional procedure.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
The administrative-jurisdictional procedure for cancellation of trade marks has been further developed by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 169/2022, which amends and supplements the Trade Marks Law, and entered into force on 13 December 2022.
The Trade Marks Law, as amended and supplemented, provides that:
♦ The administrative proceedings for cancellation are optional. In other words, these proceedings cannot prevent interested persons from filing a claim directly with the competent court.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
The Trade Marks Law defines the course of a cancellation claim within the administrative-jurisdictional proceedings before the OSIM, which can be summarised as follows:
→ The cancellation claim is filed with the OSIM. The Trade Marks Law sets down the information required for the cancellation claim. The claim should be drafted in the Romanian language and include the grounds for cancellation and the supporting evidence.
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
► admit the claim in whole or in part, ordering the invalidation of the trade mark or the revocation of the rights conferred by the trade mark in whole or in part, as the case may be;
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
The Board cannot rule on the legality of civil acts based on an invalidated trade mark and on the civil effects arising from it. In this case, the matter should be referred to the competent court.
For more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() ![]() |
| Articol 796 / 4602 | Următorul articol |
| Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
![]() |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Clifford Chance Badea a asistat consorțiul de bănci de investiții în legătură cu emisiunea de obligațiuni AT1 de 500 milioane Euro lansată de Banca Transilvania pe piețele externe
Popovici Nițu Stoica & Asociații a asistat Hexagon în achiziția Platformei CUG din Cluj, într-unul dintre cele mai mari proiecte imobiliare ale anului
Patru firme de avocați, în proiectul prin care Banca Transilvania a finalizat cu succes cea mai mare emisiune de obligaţiuni AT 1 din Europa Centrală şi de Est
Lexology Index: Arbitration - 2026 | Arbitrajul românesc nu mai este doar „prezent” în clasamentele globale, ci începe să-și contureze, în mod coerent, un ecosistem. Patru avocați, printre care Cosmin Vasile (ZRVP), Crenguța Leaua (LDDP) și Luminița Popa (Popa Legal) formează nucleul de influență al practicii. ZRVP Și LDDP au cei mai mulți profesioniști în categoriile Thought Leaders și Future Leaders. România devine un „hub” credibil în arbitrajul regional
Fiscalitate ̸ Litigii Fiscale - Practica de Taxe a Kinstellar funcționează ca un „hub” integrat între drept, fiscalitate și finanțe, ce conturează un parcurs procedural previzibil, din faza de control al documentelor până la soluțiile finale ale instanței. Clienții beneficiază de pregătire proactivă, probatoriu robust și o echipă calibrată pentru litigii sofisticate | De vorbă cu Theodor Artenie (Counsel) și Raluca Botea (Counsel) despre tendințele ultimului an, prevenție, timing și modul de lucru al unei echipe recunoscute de directoarele internaționale
PNSA asistă Rex Concepts în obținerea unor linii de finanțare de la Bank Pekao pentru dezvoltarea rețelelor Burger King și Popeyes | Echipa de proiect a fost coordonată de partenerul Silviu Stoica, alături de Ioana Lazăr (Senior Associate) și Crina Stan (Associate)
Primul pas real spre avocatura de business | În culisele programului de practică juridică organizat de Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații, o adevărată școală de formare și începutul unui dialog profesional. Cursanții implicați în program au apreciat comunicarea continuă și proiectele în care au fost implicați și ar recomanda această experiență altor studenți. Avocații-mentori spun că experiența de practică autentică oferă prilejul de a înțelege care sunt valorile ce definesc profesia
Schoenherr asistă Allianz-Țiriac Asigurări în vânzarea unei clădiri de birouri către Primavera Development. Echipa, coordonată de Mădălina Mitan (partner)
Într-un an cu investigații mai tehnice și presiune pe termene, DLA Piper România așază practica de Concurență pe trei piloni - oameni, metodă, ritm, astfel încât proiectarea strategiilor, controlul probelor și continuitatea între faze să producă cele mai bune rezultate | De vorbă cu membrii unei echipe sudate, condusă de lideri cu experiență și antrenată pe industrii sensibile, despre prudență juridică și curaj tactic, cooperare internă și rigoare probatorie, bazate pe înțelegerea fină a mediului de business și utilizarea tehnologiei ca multiplicator de acuratețe
GNP obține o nouă soluție favorabilă definitivă la Înalta Curte de Casație și Justiție prin care a fost anulată o decizie de sancționare emisă de Consiliul Concurenței | Reper jurisprudențial care impune un standard de analiză mai riguros în litigiile de concurență
Băncilă, Diaconu și Asociații a asistat asociații Mamaia Resort Hotels în vânzarea părților lor sociale către Steaua de Mare Hotels & Resorts
LegiTeam: GNP Guia Naghi and Partners — Corporate | M&A Associate (2–4 years)
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...









RSS





