CMS | Romanian trade marks can be cancelled by the OSIM
27 Ianuarie 2023
CMS RomaniaFor more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
As of 14 January 2023, requests can be made with the Romanian State Office for Inventions and Trade Marks (OSIM) to cancel trade marks by using an administrative-jurisdictional procedure.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
According to Romania's recently updated Trade Marks Law (Law no. 84/1998 on Trade Marks and Geographical Indications), the invalidation and revocation of a trade mark may be requested either by judicial proceedings before the Bucharest Tribunal or by administrative-jurisdictional proceedings, before the OSIM.
The possibility to file a cancellation claim before the OSIM has been newly introduced in Romanian legislation, following the transposition of the Directive (EU) 2015/2436 relating to trade marks (recast), which obliges EU member states to implement an administrative procedure for the revocation or invalidation of trade-mark rights.
The administrative-jurisdictional procedure for cancellation of trade marks has been further developed by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 169/2022, which amends and supplements the Trade Marks Law, and entered into force on 13 December 2022.
The Trade Marks Law, as amended and supplemented, provides that:
♦ The administrative proceedings for cancellation are optional. In other words, these proceedings cannot prevent interested persons from filing a claim directly with the competent court.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
♦ The claim is assigned to a specialised Board within the OSIM, whose members are only responsible for resolving claims for cancellation, without being involved in any other procedure on trade marks carried out by the OSIM and without interfering with the activity of the Board of Appeals within the OSIM.
♦ OSIM decisions rendered in cancellation proceedings can be appealed within 30 days of the communication before the Bucharest Tribunal. The decision of the Bucharest Tribunal is only subject to appeal before the Bucharest Court of Appeals.
The Trade Marks Law defines the course of a cancellation claim within the administrative-jurisdictional proceedings before the OSIM, which can be summarised as follows:
→ The cancellation claim is filed with the OSIM. The Trade Marks Law sets down the information required for the cancellation claim. The claim should be drafted in the Romanian language and include the grounds for cancellation and the supporting evidence.
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
→ Within five days of the registration of the claim, the secretary of the Board will check whether the claim contains all relevant information and observes the formal requirements provided by the law. The secretary will then forward the claim to the "rapporteur", who is one of the members of the Board.
→ If the claim is irregular, the claimant will be notified and will be given five days to remedy the irregularities. If the irregularities persist, the Board will reject the claim without summoning the parties.
→ If the claim is compliant, it will be served to the respondent who should reply within 30 days of the communication.
→ The reply of the respondent will be served to the claimant who can file a standpoint within ten days of the communication.
→ The parties will be summoned for a public hearing. The hearing can be secret if the public debate could damage one of the parties or public order.
→ Upon the reasoned request of the parties or where the hearing reveals a need for the filing of supplementary evidence, the hearing can be adjourned until later.
→ At the end of the debates, the Board will deliberate in secret on the decision to be taken. If the Board finds that further information or documents are required, it may reopen the case by setting a new hearing and summoning the parties.
→ In terms of a decision, the Board can:
► admit the claim in whole or in part, ordering the invalidation of the trade mark or the revocation of the rights conferred by the trade mark in whole or in part, as the case may be;
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
► reject the claim;
► take note of the withdrawal of the claim;
► take note of the settlement reached between the parties;
► declare the claim to be no longer admissible if it remained unprocessed for six months for reasons attributable to the claimant.
The Board cannot rule on the legality of civil acts based on an invalidated trade mark and on the civil effects arising from it. In this case, the matter should be referred to the competent court.
For more information on the Trade Marks Law and on other intellectual property issues affecting your Romania-based business, contact your CMS client partner or CMS experts: Cristina Popescu and Carmen Turcu.
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
Articol 553 / 4360 | Următorul articol |
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
BREAKING NEWS
ESENTIAL
Legiteam | Cherciu & Co is looking for two Junior ̸ Mid - Level Lawyers
LegiTeam | CMS CAMERON MCKENNA NABARRO OLSWANG LLP SCP is looking for: Associate (Banking & Finance Team)
Finanțele caută avocați pentru litigii arbitrale internaționale judecate potrivit regulilor de arbitraj ICC Paris | Acorduri-cadru de reprezentare juridică a României semnate cu cel mult 6 firme, într-un interval de 4 ani. Pentru de a primi cât mai multe propuneri, complete și corecte, termenul de transmitere a ofertelor a fost prelungit
Voicu & Asociații is looking for business lawyers (maximum 5 years from Bar admission)
Mega-proiectul Neptun Deep din Marea Neagră merge înainte, dau asigurări reprezentanții OMV Petrom, dar și arbitrajul cu statul român pentru modificarea legii offshore continuă | Avocații LDDP asigură apărarea în litigiul de la Curtea Internațională de Arbitraj de la Paris
GDPR | Avocații specializați în practica de Data Protection de la Reff & Asociații - Deloitte Legal spun că preocuparea pentru conformare excedează domeniul protecției datelor. Silvia Axinescu, Senior Managing Associate: ”Abordăm fiecare proiect într-o manieră holistică și recunoaștem că protecția datelor, deși foarte importantă, este doar o piesă a puzzle-ului”
EXCLUSIV | O companie din grupul controlat de ”regele eolienelor” a trimis Ministerului Finanțelor o notificare de arbitraj și o cerere de soluționare pe cale amiabilă a disputei. Tratatul Cartei Energiei, temeiul juridic al conflictului cu statul român
Avocații noii generații | De vorbă cu Mihnea Orjan, avocat cu 5 ani experiență și recent laureat al Premiului de Excelență „Sarmiza Bilcescu-Alimănișteanu”, despre avocatură ca vocație, activitatea de cercetare, implicare și crez profesional: „Misiunea este pentru mine clară: să devin cel mai bun în ceea ce fac. Nu este o aroganță, este doar o înțelegere a faptului că trebuie să țintești spre Lună ca să ai șansa de a atinge o stea. Plănuiesc să fac ceea ce am făcut și până acum: să lupt pentru ceea ce cred și pentru cei care mă cheamă să îi apăr”
VIDEO | Dicționar de arbitraj: Cum se redactează o clauză compromisorie (Powered by ZRVP)
LegiTeam: Zamfirescu Racoţi Vasile & Partners recrutează avocați stagiari | Litigii
Avocații din practica de Protecția Datelor de la NNDKP spun că există în continuare prevederi neclare în legislație și „pete albe” de reglementare | Iurie Cojocaru (Partener): “De foarte multe ori, clienții se confruntă cu dificultăți în ceea ce privește ștergerea datelor sau oferirea unor răspunsuri adecvate la solicitările de exercitare de drepturi, în condițiile în care legislația, ghidurile și jurisprudența oferă prea puțin spațiu de manevră”
Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații apără interesele statului român în litigiul inițiat de Damen Holding la Curtea de Arbitraj de la Viena | Legea 187 ̸ 2023 referitoare la guvernanța corporativă a întreprinderilor publice a pus pe butuci modelul de cooperare cu investitorul olandez la Damen Shipyards Mangalia SA, o companie în care statul deține 51%, prin Șantierul Naval 2 Mai SA. Pierderea litigiului antrenează plata unor ”despăgubiri semnificative”
Citeste pe SeeNews Digital Network
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...