KPMG Legal- Toncescu si asociatii: “Competition law and Covid 19 in a nutshell”
16 Aprilie 2020
Laura Toncescu (Partner, Head of Toncescu și Asociații – KPMG Legal), Cristiana Fernbach (Partner) si Anda Tufan (Manager)· Companies are encouraged to approach the Commission, the EFTA Surveillance Authority or their national competition authority whenever they have doubts about the compatibility with competition rules of the temporary measures they have adopted.
Laura Toncescu (Partner, Head of Toncescu si Asociatii - KPMG Legal), Cristiana Fernbach (Partner) si Anda Tufan (Manager) |
Anticompetitive practices and abuse of dominance
1. At European level
Due to the continuous need for products and due to the difficulties that some companies are facing during the coronavirus crisis, the European Competition Network (“ECN”) has published a joint statement on the application of competition law during these difficult times, which is intended to guide the competitive behavior of companies:
· ► For the purpose of avoiding a shortage of supply, companies can take temporary measures to cooperate, solely to ensure the supply and fair distribution of scarce products to all consumers. However, these measures should not infringe competition law.
· ► Companies are encouraged to approach the Commission, the EFTA Surveillance Authority or their national competition authority whenever they have doubts about the compatibility with competition rules of the temporary measures they have adopted.
· ► Products that are essential to protect the health of consumers should be kept at competitive prices. The ECN has announced that it will take action against companies that abuse their position or that take advantage of the current situation generated by the pandemic and raise their prices without an objective justification.
· ► Manufacturers are encouraged to apply the existing legal provisions which allow them to set maximum resale prices for their products. In this way, they may prevent their distributors from increasing prices in an unjustified manner.
2. On a national level
The Competition Council’s recommendations are in line with those formulated by the ECN. The focus is mainly (i) on the possibility for companies to act in a coordinated manner in order to avoid a deficit of essential products and to ensure their balanced distribution and (ii) on maintaining competitive prices for products . Even if cooperation between competitors may appear to be an efficient way to respond to the challenges of the market, the legal prohibitions on anti-competitive practices should not be neglected.
Permitted practices |
Prohibited practices |
Ø Increasing prices with an objective justification (e.g. an increase in the price of raw materials, limited availability of couriers or transportation companies, decrease of stocks). Ø Formulating measures to prevent the abusive increase of the prices of essential products and services on online platforms (e.g. prohibiting the sale of overpriced essential products on online marketplace platforms, limiting the unjustified raising of the prices of essential products, suspending the sale of certain products if abuse is suspected). Ø Formulating measures to reduce the risk of speculation and to allow more consumers to buy what they need (e.g. limiting the quantities of essential products which can be acquired by one person, or amending opening hours). Ø Coordinating actions to ensure the supply and distribution of essential products to all or only certain consumers (e.g. companies may coordinate to transport their merchandise and to organize home deliveries for consumers at high risk).
|
Ø Increasing prices as a consequence of the crisis situation, without an objective justification. Ø Exchanging sensitive information such as business strategy, commercial policy, pricing information. Ø Excluding other competitors from the market. Ø Abusing a dominant market position (e.g. increasing the price of products considered essential for the health of the consumer such as face masks and sanitizing gel in the case of producers which have a market share of at least 40% or even with a lower market share if certain conditions are met). Ø Concluding anti-competitive agreements with competitors in order to eliminate the sale of a particular product or service, fixing prices or allocating customers or territories between competitors.
|
There is no direct recommendation to consider a practice as being permitted or prohibited because the assessment of each practice will be carried out depending on (i) the industry in which the company is operating and (ii) the particularities of each case.
For further immediate guidance and an agile assessment of each planned cooperation measure related to the COVID-19 crisis, please contact us.
I. State-aid
1. At European level
On 19 March 2020, the European Commission issued the Temporary Framework for State Aid measures to enable Member States to support the economy during the current COVID-19 outbreak, as amended on 3 April 2020 (the “Temporary Framework”). It announced the following types of aid, subject to fulfilling certain conditions, that Member States may provide according to Art. 107(3) of the TFEU in order to diminish the effects of the COVID-19 crisis on the economy:
· → Aid schemes consisting of direct grants, advance payments and selective tax advantages that will not exceed €800,000 per company.
· → Aid in the form of public guarantees on investment and working capital loans for companies facing difficulties or entering into difficulty as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.
· → Subsidised interest rates for loans relating to both investment and working capital needs, available to both large companies and small and medium sized companies.
· → Aid in the form of guarantees and loans channelled through credit institutions or other financial institutions to be provided to undertakings facing a sudden liquidity shortage.
· Short-term export credit insurance
· Direct grants, tax advantages and repayable advances to support coronavirus related research and development,
· → Direct grants, tax advantages and repayable advances and no-loss guarantees investments enabling the construction or upgrading of testing and upscaling infrastructures needed to develop and test products useful to tackle the coronavirus outbreak,
· → Direct grants, tax advantages and repayable advances and no-loss guarantees Investment enabling the rapid production of coronavirus-relevant products, such as vaccines, medical devices, hospital and medical equipment and necessary raw material, disinfectants or data collection/processing tools;
· → Aid in form of deferrals of tax payments and/or suspensions of social security contributions;
·→ → Aid in form of wage subsidies for employees aimed at preserving employment during the outbreak.
If any of the Member States intends to adopt one of the state-aid schemes listed in the Temporary Framework, it must seek the approval of the European Commission as soon as possible. The European Commission undertakes to approve such state aid schemes at very short notice.
The Member States (i) must publish relevant information on each individual grant of aid awarded under the Temporary Framework on the comprehensive state aid website within 12 months of the date it is granted, with the exception of the last two forms of aid from our bullet point list above and (ii) must provide the European Commission with a list of measures put in place on the basis of schemes approved based on the Temporary Framework no later than 31 December 2020.
Separately from the above-mentioned measures that fall under Art. 107 (3) of the TFEU, Member States can also adopt certain supportive measures that fall under the exemption provided in Art. 107 (2) of the TFEU, which provides that aid to make good the damage caused by exceptional occurrences is compatible with the rules of the internal market. Recently, the European Commission recognized that the COVID-19 outbreak qualifies as an ”exceptional occurrence” under Art. 107 (2) b) of the TFEU. This means that Member States can take various crisis measures in order to diminish the negative effects that an “exceptional occurrence” can have on the most affected sectors, such as providing financial support for consumers for cancelled flights or suspending the payment of taxes such as VAT, corporate tax etc. When aid falls under this category, it will be exempted automatically. However, this does not mean that the aid is free of the European Commission’s control. The European Commission will have to keep under review all systems of aid and must ensure that measures taken under Art. 107 (2) actually fall under this category. For these reasons, some Member States have already notified the European Commission about the measures taken under Art. 107(2) of the TFEU.
2. On a national level
The Romanian Government has recently passed some measures in order to support the economy in Romania in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, namely within the Government Emergency Ordinances no. 29/2020 on some economic and financial – budgetary measures, published in the Official Journal of Romania on 21 March 2020 and 42/2020 for amending and completing the Government Ordinance no. 110/2017 regarding the support program for small and medium sized-enterprises (“SME”) IMM INVEST ROMANIA, and also for approving the State aid scheme for supporting the activity of the SME in the context of the economic crisis generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Government Ordinances are aiming at reducing the impact of the pandemic on the economy by enacting measures such as :i) introducing the possibility of accessing one or more investment loans and/or one or more loans for working capital guaranteed by the State in a percentage of maximum 80% from the financed amount and raising the limit of public guaranteed loan from RON 1,250,000 to a maximum of RON 10,000,000; (ii) introducing the possibility of accessing one or more loans for working capital for microenterprises and small enterprises guaranteed by the State in a percentage of maximum 90% from the financed amount; (iii) granting a subsidy of 100% of the interest rates for loans for microenterprises and small enterprises that fall under art. 1 (3) b) of GEO no. 110/2017 on the Support Program for SME – IMM Invest Romania, (iv) public support from the state budget of the administration and risk fees that companies must pay to the Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Credit Guarantee Fund - but only during the entire period when the de minimis schemes are ongoing.
Also, the Government Ordinance no. 42/2020 approves the State aid scheme for supporting the activity of the SME in the context of the economic crisis generated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The measures will be granted after the European Commission issues the approval decision.
Moreover, during the state of emergency, SME may defer the payment of invoices for rent and utilities services (water, gas, internet, telephone, electricity) for their headquarters and secondary offices if (i) their activity has been totally or partially interrupted by a decision of the authorities during the state of emergency and (ii) they obtain an emergency certificate issued by the Ministry of Economy, Energy and Business Environment.
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
Articol 4101 / 4405 | Următorul articol |
Publicitate pe BizLawyer? |
ZRVP: 30 de ani de tradiție în avocatură, un nou look pentru viitor | Cosmin Vasile (managing partner): Noua imagine reflectă identitatea și tradiția brandului nostru, reinterpretate într-o manieră modernă și îndrăzneață
Edward Sukyas pierde arbitrajul cu statul român și trebuie să plătească peste o jumătate de milion de euro - cheltuieli arbitrale și onorarii plătite avocaților care au apărat România. Litigiul cu Jack Sukyas merge mai departe, modul de alocare a cheltuielilor de arbitraj fiind decis într-o etapă ulterioară a procedurii | Cât au însumat onorariile primite de avocații români aflați de-o parte și alta a baricadei și ce sume au încasat arbitrii
Cum a fost anul 2024 pentru Duțescu & Partners: poziționare în topul internațional al firmelor de avocați evidențiate în practica de Capital Markets, lansarea practicii de drept islamic și multe victorii obținute pentru clienți | De vorbă cu Dr. Cristian Duțescu (partener fondator) și Casiana Dușa (partener) despre parcurs, proiecte și realizări
Precedent important obținut de RTPR pentru Premier Energy Furnizare în materia teoriei impreviziunii. Despăgubiri de aproximativ 4 milioane EUR și dobânzi legale penalizatoare, ca urmare a neexecutării unui contract de furnizare de energie încheiat pe piața PCCB-BC. Alexandru Stănoiu (Counsel) și Ana Popa (Senior Associate), în echipa coordonată de Valentin Berea (Partener)
Bulboacă și Asociații facilitează atragerea de finanțare, la final de an, pentru o companie românească de succes din industria panificației
Pentru echipa de insolvență de la Țuca Zbârcea & Asociații, anul 2024 s-a caracterizat printr-o intensificare a volumului de muncă, cu mandate noi care s-au adăugat unui portofoliu existent bogat. Cele mai multe proiecte au avut complexitate și miză ridicată, necesitând extinderea echipelor implicate și un volum mai intens de activitate | De vorbă cu Cătălina Mihăilescu (Partener) despre activitatea departamentului și planurile de viitor
INTERVIURI 2+1 | Povestea lui “Timi”, numele de alint al biroului NNDKP din Nord-Vestul țării, înființat acum 20 de ani într-o perioadă fără smartphone, Google sau LinkedIn, spusă de doi avocați care au trăit intens toate etapele devenirii sale ca furnizor pentru mediul de afaceri local, standard de etică și membru al comunității academice: ”Vineri la prânz încă nu se născuse ideea; luni, la 10:15, era aprobată”. Mai apoi, ”cu profesionalism, corectitudine și smerenie” a devenit ”un organism viu și adaptabil, care se modelează după viața afacerilor din regiune în fiecare moment”
Meet the Professionals | Din vorbă în vorbă cu Cristina Roșu, proaspăt promovată Partner în cadrul firmei Toncescu și Asociații - KPMG Legal: “Angajarea mea la KPMG Legal după terminarea facultății a fost punctul de plecare al unei călătorii profesionale frumoase și pline de satisfacții, care m-a adus unde sunt astăzi. Am crescut încet, dar constant, în această firmă, dezvoltându-mă ca profesionist, dar mai ales ca om”
Echipa Wolf Theiss dedicată proiectelor din materia insolvenței este în proces de creștere și consolidare, având în vedere interesul ridicat acordat acestui domeniu și creșterea numărului și complexității proiectelor. ”În perioada recentă, ne-au fost solicitate de către clienți numeroase analize privind posibila deschidere a procedurii insolvenței, efectele și riscurile unei astfel de proceduri, dar și opțiunile reglementate pentru restructurarea afacerii, ceea ce arată interesul crescut al companiilor în utilizarea mecanismelor legale”, spun avocații
Băiculescu & Asociații continuă extinderea. Alți doi avocați se alătură firmei, întărind departamentele de Drept Penal și Litigii | Vasile Băiculescu (Managing Partner): ”Fundația unei societăți de avocatură este formată din echipe solide, orientate spre soluții și dedicare pentru client. Continuăm să creștem pentru a oferi un serviciu de calitate”
Insolvență ̸ Restructurare | În spatele scenei, alături de echipa NNDKP, într-o discuție cu trei dintre coordonatorii acestui segment de practică ce a generat venituri de cca. 11 % din total, anul trecut. Debt-recovery rămâne în continuare o parte importantă din activitatea echipei. Focusul tinde să migreze spre procedurile de pre-insolvență, iar componenta de turnaround și restructurare crește în mod constant. Numărul procedurilor de insolvență va crește cu 10-12% în următorii doi ani, estimează avocații
Bondoc și Asociații obține o clarificare importantă la ÎCCJ cu privire la stabilirea competenței pentru soluționarea litigiilor în legătură cu încheierea contractelor finanțate din fonduri alocate prin PNRR, de către beneficiari privați care nu au obligația aplicării procedurilor de achiziție publică
-
BizBanker
-
BizLeader
- in curand...
-
SeeNews
in curand...